DIAMOND CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LTD
CIK 929649Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- For and on behalf of Dundas & Wilson CS LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.60×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ballard Spahr | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Fried Frank | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| For and on behalf of Dundas & Wilson CS LLP | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 9 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 2.60 |
| White & Case | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- TIMOTHY E. PETERSONFried FrankFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Scott D. MillerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIMOTHY E. PETERSONFried Frank | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Scott D. MillerSullivan & Cromwell | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 1.30 |