MATTSON TECHNOLOGY INC MTSN (last ticker on record)
CIK 928421Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2016 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| DLA Piper | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Piper Rudnick | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Chad G. RolstonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Michael E. CokeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Michael A. OcchioliniWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.74×
- Tony JeffriesWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Diane Holt FrankleDLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Bradley J. RockDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 3.80×
- Sally J. RauDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.48×
- Peter M. AstizDLA PiperFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Michael OcchioliniDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chad G. RolstonLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2016 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2016 | Named in a filing | 54 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Michael E. CokeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Michael A. OcchioliniWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 2.74 |
| Tony JeffriesWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Diane Holt FrankleDLA Piper | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.37 | 1.59 | 1.06 |
| Bradley J. RockDLA Piper | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.79 | 1.93 | 3.80 |
| Sally J. RauDLA Piper | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 2.48 |
| Peter M. AstizDLA Piper | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.51 | 0.77 | 1.41 |
| Michael OcchioliniDavis Polk | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 14 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 2.42 |