US FOODSERVICE
CIK 928395Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Miles & StockbridgeFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Miles & Stockbridge | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 71 | 1.19 | 0.73 | 0.44 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.20 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Shaw Pittman | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.04 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John G. FinleySimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Charles E. SievingHogan & HartsonFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.91×
- John B. FrischMiles & StockbridgeFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.10× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- JOHN B. FRISCH UIREWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Craig M. WassermanWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Richard J. ParrinoHogan & HartsonFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John G. FinleySimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Charles E. SievingHogan & Hartson | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.91 |
| John B. FrischMiles & Stockbridge | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 3.10 | 0.00 |
| JOHN B. FRISCH UIREWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 1.66 | 0.83 |
| Craig M. WassermanWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.49 | 1.05 | 0.62 |
| Richard J. ParrinoHogan & Hartson | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 1.01 |