Fuss Brands Corp. CBP (last ticker on record)
CIK 926844Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 100%
- Mar 2000 to Dec 2014
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Bryan Cave | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William N. HaddadVenable LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Craig V. ButlerLaw Offices of Craig V. ButlerFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 2.03× · 95% wipeout 2.52×
- Brian A. LebrechtFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- DAVID M. GRIFFITHFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 2.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William N. HaddadVenable LLP | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 40 | 1.71 | 0.41 | 1.36 |
| Craig V. ButlerLaw Offices of Craig V. Butler | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.63 | 2.03 | 2.52 |
| Brian A. Lebrecht | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.46 | 1.43 | 1.43 |
| DAVID M. GRIFFITH | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.94 | 2.59 | 1.08 |