Aspira Women's Health Inc. AWHL (last ticker on record)

CIK 926617Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Bankruptcy
95% wipeout
Restatement
Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 3; Newest began Oct 2023
Largest fall in its shares: 99%; Feb 2021 to Mar 2025
Law firms: 10; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 16; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Apr 16, 2025Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 14, 2025Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 31, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 18, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 5, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 13, 2023Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 14, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 2, 2022Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 2, 2022Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 11, 2022Shares down 95% from their high
Jan 31, 2020Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 6, 2019Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 26, 2018Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 7, 2013Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 9, 2011Shares down 95% from their high
Jan 25, 2010Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 12, 2010Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 31, 2009Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 9, 2008Shares down 95% from their high
Sep 26, 2008Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 31, 2008Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 27, 2008Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 17, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 7, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 17, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 25, 2006Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 30, 2006Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 31, 2006Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 13, 2006Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 7, 2005Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 16, 2005Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 16, 2005Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Winston & Strawn	Sep 2025	Named in SEC correspondence	585	1.18	0.60	1.02
Sheppard Mullin	Jul 2024	Named in SEC correspondence	392	1.12	0.81	1.22
Cooley LLP	Feb 2023	Named in SEC correspondence	1,634	0.71	0.44	1.24
Sidley Austin	Jan 2014	Named in SEC correspondence	1,210	1.30	0.14	0.93
Paul Hastings	Sep 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	768	0.98	0.72	1.09
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	Mar 2000	Named in a filing	1,468	1.09	0.60	1.42
Greenberg Traurig	Feb 2025	Text search only	1,223	1.01	1.03	1.10
Reed Smith	Sep 2014	Text search only	487	1.15	0.77	1.13
Blank Rome	Mar 2012	Text search only	348	1.04	0.79	1.36
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Oct 2003	Text search only	2,607	1.15	0.19	0.85

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
J. Eric JohnsonWinston & Strawn	Sep 2025	Named in SEC correspondence	20	0.83	1.51	1.65
Emily A. MastoloniSheppard Mullin	Apr 2025	Named in SEC correspondence	11	0.00	0.00	0.32
Jeffrey J. FesslerSheppard Mullin	Jul 2024	Named in SEC correspondence	56	0.86	0.37	1.21
Sean F. ReidSheppard Mullin	Jul 2024	Named in SEC correspondence	30	0.76	1.45	1.14
Josh SeidenfeldCooley LLP	Jan 2024	Named in SEC correspondence	10	1.77	0.00	1.42
John T. McKennaCooley LLP	Feb 2023	Named in a filing	97	0.53	0.43	1.10
Beth E. BergSidley Austin	Jul 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	7	1.96	0.00	0.99
Beth E. PeevSidley Austin	Apr 2017	Named in SEC correspondence	6	0.00	0.00	3.26
Beth E. FlamingSidley Austin	Sep 2014	Named in SEC correspondence	8	0.00	0.00	2.30
John J. SablSidley Austin	Sep 2014	Named in a filing	11	0.82	0.00	2.64
Michael J. O DonnellMorrison & Foerster	Jun 2002	Named in a filing	10	0.62	0.00	1.80
MICHAEL J. O'DONNELLMorrison & Foerster	Mar 2000	Named in a filing	12	1.24	0.00	3.34
Richard L. PichenyTroyGould PC	Mar 2000	Named in a filing	5	0.00	0.00	3.16
Joseph M. LucoskyLucosky Brookman LLP	Feb 2025	Text search only	188	1.24	1.81	1.24
Michael A. GordonSidley Austin	Feb 2015	Text search only	19	2.07	0.00	0.88
Michael O DonnellWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	Sep 2007	Text search only	6	1.00	0.00	2.32