MICHAEL BAKER CORP BKR (last ticker on record)
CIK 9263Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K&L GatesFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K&L Gates | Sep 2013 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Reed Smith | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kevin J. LavinArnold & PorterFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Kristen L. StewartK&L GatesFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael C. McLeanK&L GatesFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
- Jeffrey G. AromatorioReed SmithFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin J. LavinArnold & Porter | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Kristen L. StewartK&L Gates | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael C. McLeanK&L Gates | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 1.64 |
| Jeffrey G. AromatorioReed Smith | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 0.92 |