CENTRAL EUROPEAN MEDIA ENTERPRISES LTD CETV (last ticker on record)
CIK 925645Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Nov 2007 to Mar 2020
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Dewey & LeBoeuf LLPFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.15×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- ROSENMAN & COLIN LLPFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 2.29× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Taylor WessingFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covington & Burling | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| DLA Piper | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 126 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| ROSENMAN & COLIN LLP | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.82 | 2.29 | 1.80 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Willkie Farr | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2012 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Mayer Brown | May 2012 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Taylor Wessing | May 2012 | Text search only | 36 | 0.60 | 1.72 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher P. PetersonArnold & PorterFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- Eric BlanchardCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- ROBERT L. KOHLKatten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.00×
- Penny J. MinnaDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Thomas MarkWillkie FarrFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- William H. GumpWillkie FarrFirst linked Mar 2009 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher P. PetersonArnold & Porter | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 10 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 1.69 |
| Eric BlanchardCooley LLP | Apr 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| ROBERT L. KOHLKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 3.00 |
| Penny J. MinnaDLA Piper | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Thomas MarkWillkie Farr | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 6 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| William H. GumpWillkie Farr | Mar 2009 | Text search only | 16 | 1.56 | 1.01 | 0.75 |