INNOVEDA INC
CIK 925072Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Ater Wynne LLPFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HALE AND DORR | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Ater Wynne LLP | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.36 | 0.74 | 0.97 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jonathan WolfmanWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Michael J. LaCasciaWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- John A. BurgessHALE AND DORRFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- ALAN K. AUSTINWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 2.79×
- ELIZABETH R. FLINTWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Steven V. BernardWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Susan L. StapletonFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan WolfmanWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 18 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Michael J. LaCasciaWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| John A. BurgessHALE AND DORR | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.99 | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| ALAN K. AUSTINWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.33 | 1.20 | 2.79 |
| ELIZABETH R. FLINTWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Steven V. BernardWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Susan L. Stapleton | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 |