DIAMOND MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANTS, INC. DTPI (last ticker on record)
CIK 924940Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Gordon & Glickson LLCFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.11×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winston & Strawn | Mar 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Gordon & Glickson LLC | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.11 |
| Morgan Lewis | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Hunton & Williams | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Sidley Austin | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian M. SchaferWinston & StrawnFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Terrence R. BradyWinston & StrawnFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.33× · Went dark 2.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Leland E. HutchinsonWinston & StrawnFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 1.63× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- JAMES A. OUNSWORTHFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian M. SchaferWinston & Strawn | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Terrence R. BradyWinston & Strawn | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.33 | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| Leland E. HutchinsonWinston & Strawn | Mar 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.89 | 1.63 | 0.97 |
| JAMES A. OUNSWORTH | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.82 |