RAINFOREST CAFE INC
CIK 924919Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 493 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 88 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 1.46 |
| Proskauer Rose | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 493 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.05 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Haynes and Boone | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.86 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Martin R. RosenbaumMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- DOUGLAS T. HOLODMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.00×
- William B. NelsonHaynes and BooneFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin R. RosenbaumMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| DOUGLAS T. HOLODMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 |
| William B. NelsonHaynes and Boone | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 37 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.72 |