SOUTHWEST WATER CO SWWC (last ticker on record)
CIK 92472Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Musick Peeler & GarrettFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| DLA Piper | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Musick Peeler & Garrett | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.47 | 1.05 | 1.11 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan M. KleinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- David EislerDLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Douglas J. ReinDLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Regina M. SchlatterLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Cynthia A. RotellLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan M. KleinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| David EislerDLA Piper | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Douglas J. ReinDLA Piper | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.08 | 0.49 | 0.90 |
| Regina M. SchlatterLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.57 | 1.12 | 0.64 |
| Cynthia A. RotellLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |