WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN INTERNATIONAL INC WLSC (last ticker on record)
CIK 923144Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Kaye ScholerFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Kelly Hart & HallmanFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Husch BlackwellFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Stites & HarbisonFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Whiteford Taylor & PrestonFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Davies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Hastings | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Kaye Scholer | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 161 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| Kelly Hart & Hallman | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 30 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.82 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Husch Blackwell | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 154 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.18 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Stites & Harbison | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 35 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Whiteford Taylor & Preston | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 35 | 1.16 | 0.48 | 1.42 |
| Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 94 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William F. SchwitterPaul HastingsFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Jeffrey D. KarpfCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- John C. KennedyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- John KennedyFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Gary LiPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William F. SchwitterPaul Hastings | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Jeffrey D. KarpfCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 2.58 | 0.00 | 1.42 |
| John C. KennedyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 88 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| John Kennedy | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 38 | 1.20 | 0.65 | 1.23 |
| Gary LiPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 6 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 0.95 |