CNL RESTAURANT PROPERTIES INC
CIK 922981Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in a filing · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Jan 2005 | Named in a filing | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.59 |
| Ballard Spahr | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.78 |
| Baker & Hostetler | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.39 |
| Shaw Pittman | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.04 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John M. McDonaldShaw PittmanFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas H. McCormickShaw PittmanFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John M. McDonaldShaw Pittman | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Thomas H. McCormickShaw Pittman | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.92 |