NOVA CHEMICALS CORP /NEW
CIK 922960Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Macleod DixonFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Macleod Dixon | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 31 | 0.46 | 0.57 | 1.49 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Torys LLP | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 170 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brett CooperOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Alan TalkingtonOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brett CooperOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.84 | 2.34 | 0.81 |
| Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Alan TalkingtonOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.54 | 1.10 | 0.00 |