ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INC ESI (last ticker on record)
CIK 922475Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Aug 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked May 2013 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre Baker Daniels | May 2013 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Baker & Daniels | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Christine G. LongFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- JAMES A. ASCHLEMANBaker & DanielsFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Christine G. LongFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 20 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| JAMES A. ASCHLEMANBaker & Daniels | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.55 | 1.33 | 1.47 |