BUDGET GROUP INC BDGPA (last ticker on record)
CIK 922471Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2000
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 1998 to Aug 2004
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Aug 1998 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Ice MillerFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Aug 1998 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Ice Miller | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 112 | 1.19 | 0.21 | 0.93 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| King & Spalding | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven K. HumkeIce MillerFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.16×
- C. William BaxleyKing & SpaldingFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Jeffrey M. SteinKing & SpaldingFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 4.13× · 95% wipeout 1.95×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven K. HumkeIce Miller | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 4.16 |
| C. William BaxleyKing & Spalding | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Jeffrey M. SteinKing & Spalding | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 1.59 | 4.13 | 1.95 |