SEABULK INTERNATIONAL INC SBLK (last ticker on record)
CIK 922341Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Dyer Ellis & JosephFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 4.73× · 95% wipeout 2.20×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- [Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead]First linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 197 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.10× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
| Dyer Ellis & Joseph | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 4.73 | 2.20 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| [Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead] | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 197 | 0.73 | 0.10 | 0.61 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- MICHAEL JOSEPHDyer Ellis & JosephFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 4.61× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
- C. MICHAEL HARRINGTONVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.61×
- James M. PrinceVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Richard E. FarleyCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MICHAEL JOSEPHDyer Ellis & Joseph | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.93 | 4.61 | 1.83 |
| C. MICHAEL HARRINGTONVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 10 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 2.61 |
| James M. PrinceVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 26 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| Richard E. FarleyCahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 11 | 3.12 | 0.00 | 0.90 |