ENOVA SYSTEMS INC ENVS (last ticker on record)
CIK 922237Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2008 to May 2012
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Reed SmithFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Crosby, Heafey, Roach & MayFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reed Smith | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.56 | 1.32 | 1.52 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David T. MittelmanReed SmithFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.19× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- Deborah L. GunnySANDERS, BARNET, GOLDMAN, SIMONS & MOSKFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 4.11× · 95% wipeout 1.91×
- Donald C. ReinkeReed SmithFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 7.40× · 95% wipeout 2.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David T. MittelmanReed Smith | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 21 | 2.19 | 1.51 | 1.60 |
| Deborah L. GunnySANDERS, BARNET, GOLDMAN, SIMONS & MOSK | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.27 | 4.11 | 1.91 |
| Donald C. ReinkeReed Smith | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 7.40 | 2.24 |