SSR MINING INC. SSRM (last ticker on record)
CIK 921638Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Sep 2021 · Named in a filing · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Lawson LundellFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 0.19×
- Perkins, Smith & Cohen, LLPFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Sep 2021 | Named in a filing | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Lawson Lundell | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.35 | 0.84 | 0.19 |
| Perkins, Smith & Cohen, LLP | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael S. LeeReed SmithFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Edwin S. MaynardPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Fred H. BrownFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael S. LeeReed Smith | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Edwin S. MaynardPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.23 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Fred H. Brown | Feb 2009 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |