TRICO MARINE SERVICES INC TRMA (last ticker on record)
CIK 921549Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Aug 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 1997 to Oct 2004
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bartlit BeckFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 2.39× · 95% wipeout 2.27×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Nov 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Jones WalkerFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked May 2009 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked May 2009 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bartlit Beck | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.94 | 2.39 | 2.27 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Nov 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Jones Walker | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 161 | 1.34 | 0.23 | 0.94 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | May 2009 | Text search only | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | May 2009 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Holland & Knight | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James L. PalencharBartlit BeckFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
- Kevin P. LewisVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.71×
- Margaret F. MurphyJones WalkerFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- William B. MastersJones WalkerFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.59× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 2.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James L. PalencharBartlit Beck | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.58 |
| Kevin P. LewisVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 2.71 |
| Margaret F. MurphyJones Walker | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 1.65 |
| William B. MastersJones Walker | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 3.59 | 0.71 | 2.78 |