SOUTHTRUST CORP SOTR (last ticker on record)
CIK 92081Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Bradley Arant Rose & WhiteFirst linked Mar 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Mays & Valentine, L.L.P.First linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Willcox & SavageFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Bradley Arant Rose & White | Mar 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
| Mays & Valentine, L.L.P. | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 25 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 0.00 |
| Willcox & Savage | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 13 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul S. WareBradley Arant Boult CummingsFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- STANLEY H. POLLOCKHolland & KnightFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul S. WareBradley Arant Boult Cummings | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| STANLEY H. POLLOCKHolland & Knight | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 2.18 |