BROADVISION INC BVSN (last ticker on record)
CIK 920448Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2004 to Jan 2019
- Law firms
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Craig D. JacobyCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.18×
- Peter H. WernerCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.96×
- Virginia C. EdwardsCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Jamie E. ChungCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- Kenneth L. GuernseyCooley LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Craig D. JacobyCooley LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.18 |
| Peter H. WernerCooley LLP | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 2.96 |
| Virginia C. EdwardsCooley LLP | Sep 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Jamie E. ChungCooley LLP | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 2.34 |
| Kenneth L. GuernseyCooley LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 1.38 |