Midatech Pharma US Inc. DARA (last ticker on record)
CIK 919745Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2008 to May 2015
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brown RudnickFirst linked Oct 2015 · Named in a filing · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Kennedy Covington Lobdell & HickmanFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown Rudnick | Oct 2015 | Named in a filing | 137 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.97 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| K&L Gates | Oct 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Kennedy Covington Lobdell & Hickman | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 1.04 | 0.38 | 1.29 |
| Ropes & Gray | Feb 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Paul Hastings | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 113 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 1.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason S. McCaffreyMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Dec 2015 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Samuel P. WilliamsBrown RudnickFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Alan WovsanikerLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Lloyd JeglikowskiLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- John D. HogoboomLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.07× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Patrick J. RogersK&L GatesFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Mark R. BuschK&L GatesFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.20×
- Steven A. WilcoxRopes & GrayFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Luke P. Iovine IIIPaul HastingsFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.45×
- Donald R. ReynoldsWyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason S. McCaffreyMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Dec 2015 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Samuel P. WilliamsBrown Rudnick | Dec 2015 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Alan WovsanikerLowenstein Sandler | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Lloyd JeglikowskiLowenstein Sandler | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.47 |
| John D. HogoboomLowenstein Sandler | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 0.59 | 1.07 | 1.17 |
| Patrick J. RogersK&L Gates | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.59 |
| Mark R. BuschK&L Gates | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 2.20 |
| Steven A. WilcoxRopes & Gray | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Luke P. Iovine IIIPaul Hastings | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.45 |
| Donald R. ReynoldsWyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 41 | 0.87 | 0.38 | 0.98 |