XECHEM INTERNATIONAL INC XKEM (last ticker on record)
CIK 919611Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- SHEFSKY & FROELICHFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 2.29× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Naccarato & AssociatesFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 0.31×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Michael A. Littman Attorney at LawFirst linked Dec 2007 · Text search only · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 2.01× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Grushko & MittmanFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.53× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHEFSKY & FROELICH | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.74 | 2.29 | 0.68 |
| Naccarato & Associates | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.96 | 1.66 | 0.31 |
| Duane Morris | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Michael A. Littman Attorney at Law | Dec 2007 | Text search only | 61 | 1.16 | 2.01 | 1.14 |
| Grushko & Mittman | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 103 | 1.19 | 2.53 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Owen NaccaratoNaccarato & AssociatesFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 2.15× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Mitchell D. GoldsmithTaft Stettinius & HollisterFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.31× · Went dark 1.42× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Michael H. MargulisDuane MorrisFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 5.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Owen NaccaratoNaccarato & Associates | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.07 | 2.15 | 0.64 |
| Mitchell D. GoldsmithTaft Stettinius & Hollister | Oct 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 2.31 | 1.42 | 0.56 |
| Michael H. MargulisDuane Morris | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.90 | 5.12 | 0.76 |