Onstream Media CORP ONSM (last ticker on record)
CIK 919130Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Feb 2007 to Feb 2016
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dickinson WrightFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in a filing · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Arnstein & Lehr LLPFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.79× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Adorno & Yoss, P.A.First linked Jul 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- DALE S. BERGMANFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 2.18×
- Atlas Pearlman, P.A.First linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 81 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Sep 2008 · Text search only · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Sep 2008 · Text search only · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Arent FoxFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dickinson Wright | Dec 2016 | Named in a filing | 104 | 1.20 | 1.73 | 1.43 |
| Arnstein & Lehr LLP | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.79 | 1.81 | 1.80 |
| Adorno & Yoss, P.A. | Jul 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 1.62 | 1.01 | 1.22 |
| DALE S. BERGMAN | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.65 | 0.95 | 2.18 |
| Atlas Pearlman, P.A. | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 81 | 1.99 | 1.89 | 1.75 |
| Hunton & Williams | Sep 2008 | Text search only | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Sep 2008 | Text search only | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Winston & Strawn | May 2002 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Arent Fox | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 90 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joel D. MayersohnAtlas Pearlman, P.A.First linked Aug 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.75× · Went dark 1.44× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Charles B. PearlmanAtlas Pearlman, P.A.First linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 1.77× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- GAYLE COLEMANAtlas Pearlman, P.A.First linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 2.55× · 95% wipeout 3.89×
- John D. HogoboomLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Sep 2008 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.07× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joel D. MayersohnAtlas Pearlman, P.A. | Aug 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 1.75 | 1.44 | 1.68 |
| Charles B. PearlmanAtlas Pearlman, P.A. | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.94 | 1.77 | 1.51 |
| GAYLE COLEMANAtlas Pearlman, P.A. | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.88 | 2.55 | 3.89 |
| John D. HogoboomLowenstein Sandler | Sep 2008 | Text search only | 49 | 0.59 | 1.07 | 1.17 |