BIOSPHERE MEDICAL INC BSMD (last ticker on record)
CIK 919015Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2000
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Hyman Phelps & McNamaraFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| Hyman Phelps & McNamara | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 105 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cynthia T. MazareasWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- James R. BurkeWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Susan W. MurleyHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.33×
- John H. ChoryLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia T. MazareasWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| James R. BurkeWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Susan W. MurleyHALE AND DORR | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.33 |
| John H. ChoryLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.50 |