CENTENNIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC CENL (last ticker on record)
CIK 919006Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2000
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- O'CONNOR, BROUDE & ARONSONFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| HALE AND DORR | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| O'CONNOR, BROUDE & ARONSON | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul D. BroudeFoley & LardnerFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Lawrence H. GennariChoate Hall & StewartFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul D. BroudeFoley & Lardner | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.30 | 0.67 | 0.73 |
| Lawrence H. GennariChoate Hall & Stewart | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 1.79 |