NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC NTII (last ticker on record)
CIK 918112Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLPFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Hughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Heller Ehrman | Dec 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 117 | 0.92 | 1.45 | 1.16 |
| Hughes Hubbard & Reed | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 121 | 1.17 | 0.21 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Maggie L. WongGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.17× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Ryan A. MurrGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Stephen C. FerruoloHeller EhrmanFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John L. DonahuePillsbury Madison & Sutro LLPFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 2.97× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- THOMAS E. SPARKS JR.Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLPFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maggie L. WongGoodwin Procter | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.00 | 2.17 | 0.98 |
| Ryan A. MurrGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 77 | 0.53 | 0.77 | 0.66 |
| Stephen C. FerruoloHeller Ehrman | Dec 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John L. DonahuePillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.64 | 2.97 | 1.70 |
| THOMAS E. SPARKS JR.Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.45 | 0.81 | 1.52 |