NUCENTRIX BROADBAND NETWORKS INC NCNXQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 917707Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2002
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Apr 1999 to Aug 2003
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- O'Sullivan Graev & KarabellFirst linked Feb 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Arter & HaddenFirst linked Jan 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.99× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| O'Sullivan Graev & Karabell | Feb 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.19 | 0.58 | 1.70 |
| Arter & Hadden | Jan 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 1.01 | 1.99 | 0.58 |
| Proskauer Rose | Dec 1995 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- RODNEY L. MOOREVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Kent JamisonLocke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.31×
- Julie M. AllenProskauer RoseFirst linked Feb 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RODNEY L. MOOREVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Kent JamisonLocke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 2.31 |
| Julie M. AllenProskauer Rose | Feb 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.49 | 0.50 | 1.38 |