TALX CORP TALX (last ticker on record)
CIK 917524Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kilpatrick StocktonFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Bingham DanaFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kilpatrick Stockton | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 191 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.91 |
| Bingham Dana | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 104 | 1.37 | 0.54 | 1.14 |
| Bryan Cave | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Haynes and Boone | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Larry D. LedbetterKilpatrick StocktonFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- James R. LeveyBryan CaveFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- R. Randall WangBryan CaveFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larry D. LedbetterKilpatrick Stockton | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| James R. LeveyBryan Cave | Jan 2005 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| R. Randall WangBryan Cave | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 28 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 1.14 |