Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc. RVLT (last ticker on record)
CIK 917523Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Sep 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2013 to Apr 2020
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hinckley Allen & SnyderFirst linked May 2015 · Named in a filing · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked May 2013 · Named in a filing · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.First linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 2.33× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 1999 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Bachner, Tally, Polevoy & Misher LLPFirst linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hinckley Allen & Snyder | May 2015 | Named in a filing | 62 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.51 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | May 2013 | Named in a filing | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A. | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.88 | 2.33 | 1.14 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jan 1999 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Bachner, Tally, Polevoy & Misher LLP | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 1.50 |
| Akerman LLP | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael J. MinahanGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Michael S. TurnerGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Randolph H. FieldsGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 1999 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 3.01× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Alison NewmanFox Rothschild LLPFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael J. MinahanGoodwin Procter | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.61 | 0.91 | 1.80 |
| Michael S. TurnerGoodwin Procter | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 2.04 | 1.54 | 0.99 |
| Randolph H. FieldsGreenberg Traurig | Jan 1999 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.54 | 3.01 | 0.80 |
| Alison NewmanFox Rothschild LLP | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.78 | 1.02 | 1.03 |