QUALITY DINING INC QDIN (last ticker on record)
CIK 917126Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Baker & Daniels | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert S. RederMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.98× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- JAMES A. ASCHLEMANBaker & DanielsFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- JAMES A. STRAINSommer & Barnard PCFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert S. RederMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 0.71 |
| JAMES A. ASCHLEMANBaker & Daniels | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.55 | 1.33 | 1.47 |
| JAMES A. STRAINSommer & Barnard PC | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 8 | 2.51 | 0.00 | 0.00 |