INTEGRYS HOLDING, INC. TEG (last ticker on record)
CIK 916863Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Reid & Priest LLPFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Feb 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2015 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Reid & Priest LLP | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.38 | 0.67 | 0.91 |
| Foley & Lardner | Feb 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard HallCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Thomas E. DunnCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
- Peter D. FetzerFoley & LardnerFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- Russell E. RybaFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard HallCravath Swaine & Moore | Aug 2006 | Named in a filing | 47 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Thomas E. DunnCravath Swaine & Moore | Aug 2006 | Named in a filing | 25 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 0.43 |
| Peter D. FetzerFoley & Lardner | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.42 |
| Russell E. RybaFoley & Lardner | Jan 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.89 |