TURBOCHEF TECHNOLOGIES INC OVEN (last ticker on record)
CIK 916545Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kilpatrick Stockton | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 191 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.91 |
| Blank Rome | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David M. EatonKilpatrick TownsendFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Ethan SeerBlank RomeFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 4.02×
- Robert J. MittmanBlank RomeFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David M. EatonKilpatrick Townsend | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Ethan SeerBlank Rome | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 17 | 2.36 | 0.60 | 4.02 |
| Robert J. MittmanBlank Rome | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.72 | 0.43 | 2.58 |