REMINGTON ARMS CO INC/
CIK 916504Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Mar 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Mar 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter J. LoughranDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- David A. BrittenhamDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Paul S. BirdDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter J. LoughranDebevoise & Plimpton | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| David A. BrittenhamDebevoise & Plimpton | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 14 | 0.63 | 1.50 | 0.68 |
| Paul S. BirdDebevoise & Plimpton | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 26 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & Reindel | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 1.15 |