PROTECTION ONE ALARM MONITORING INC
CIK 916310Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLPFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.28× · Went dark 1.77× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
- Gersten Savage LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- R. Scott FalkFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 67 | 2.28 | 1.77 | 1.64 |
| Gersten Savage LLP | May 2007 | Text search only | 137 | 1.20 | 1.38 | 1.22 |
| Morrison & Foerster | May 2007 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| R. Scott Falk | May 2007 | Text search only | 21 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
| Brown & Wood | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- R. Scott FalkKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Gary W. WolfCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 8.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jonathan I. MarkCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. Scott FalkKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| Gary W. WolfCahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 6 | 8.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jonathan I. MarkCahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 11 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 |