IGEN INTERNATIONAL INC /DE IGEN (last ticker on record)
CIK 916304Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K&L Gates | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Cooley LLP | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Akin Gump | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- R. Scott KilgoreWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.20×
- THOMAS F. COONEY IIIK&L GatesFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Meredith B. CrossWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.44×
- Andrei M. ManoliuCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. Scott KilgoreWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 4.20 |
| THOMAS F. COONEY IIIK&L Gates | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.76 | 2.28 | 0.00 |
| Meredith B. CrossWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 33 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 2.44 |
| Andrei M. ManoliuCooley LLP | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.52 | 1.20 | 0.61 |