HEALTH NET INC HNT (last ticker on record)
CIK 916085Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James P. BeaubienLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Gregg A. NoelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 206 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Peter C. KruppSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Bernard S. KramerMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James P. BeaubienLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.65 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Gregg A. NoelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 206 | 1.74 | 0.21 | 0.99 |
| Peter C. KruppSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Bernard S. KramerMcDermott Will & Emery | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 2.09 |