EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO EMN (last ticker on record)
CIK 915389Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2025 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Jones DayFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 685 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Feb 2025 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Alston & Bird | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.76 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Baker & Daniels | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.14 |
| Faegre & Benson | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.12 |
| Jones Day | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 685 | 1.25 | 0.55 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lillian BrownWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- David FoxKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Neil M. SimonGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- William B. SorabellaKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Laura G. ThatcherAlston & BirdFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Mark L. HansonJones DayFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- William G. FarrarSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lillian BrownWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| David FoxKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Neil M. SimonGreenberg Traurig | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.52 |
| William B. SorabellaKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Laura G. ThatcherAlston & Bird | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 45 | 0.83 | 1.24 | 0.99 |
| Mark L. HansonJones Day | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| William G. FarrarSullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.44 |