INSYNQ INC INSN (last ticker on record)
CIK 914626Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- de Castro P.C.First linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Mar 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Sonfield & SonfieldFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 2.62× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Seth A. FarbmanFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| de Castro P.C. | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Mar 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Sonfield & Sonfield | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.16 | 2.62 | 0.90 |
| Seth A. Farbman | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.00 | 1.51 | 0.00 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Mar 2003 · Named in a filing · 267 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.46× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Stephen M. FlemingStephen M. FlemingFirst linked Mar 2003 · Named in a filing · 84 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Robert L. Sonfield Jr.Sonfield & SonfieldFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 2.65× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Seth A. FarbmanSeth A. FarbmanFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Mar 2003 | Named in a filing | 267 | 1.06 | 1.46 | 1.24 |
| Stephen M. FlemingStephen M. Fleming | Mar 2003 | Named in a filing | 84 | 1.08 | 1.15 | 1.06 |
| Robert L. Sonfield Jr.Sonfield & Sonfield | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.15 | 2.65 | 0.92 |
| Seth A. FarbmanSeth A. Farbman | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.00 | 1.10 | 0.00 |