BRAZIL FAST FOOD CORP BOBS_OLD (last ticker on record)
CIK 914537Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2001
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Feb 1998 to Jul 2002
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akerman LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Cooperman Levitt Winikoff Lester & Newman, P.C.First linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 3.92×
- PARKER DURYEE ROSOFF & HAFTFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 3.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akerman LLP | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Cooperman Levitt Winikoff Lester & Newman, P.C. | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.15 | 1.96 | 3.92 |
| PARKER DURYEE ROSOFF & HAFT | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.80 | 1.66 | 3.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bradley D. HouserHolland & KnightFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- Ira I. RoxlandSonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 2.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bradley D. HouserHolland & Knight | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.00 | 0.65 | 1.79 |
| Ira I. RoxlandSonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.19 | 0.96 | 2.82 |