SFN Group Inc. SFN (last ticker on record)
CIK 914536Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Apr 1998 to Dec 2008
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Mazursky & Dunaway, LLPFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.11×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akerman LLP | Dec 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Mazursky & Dunaway, LLP | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 2.11 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Bryan Cave | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Jones Day | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lisa A. StaterJones DayFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.65×
- Jonathan L. AwnerAkerman LLPFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.88×
- ANDREW HULSHBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 2.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa A. StaterJones Day | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 3.65 |
| Jonathan L. AwnerAkerman LLP | Dec 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 3.88 |
| ANDREW HULSHBaker & McKenzie | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.69 | 1.17 | 2.52 |