DAN RIVER INC DRF (last ticker on record)
CIK 914384Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King & Spalding | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.01 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Winston & Strawn | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.01 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Tracy KimmelKing & SpaldingFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- John J. Kelley IIIKing & SpaldingFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- MARY A. BERNARDKing & SpaldingFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.97×
- John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tracy KimmelKing & Spalding | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| John J. Kelley IIIKing & Spalding | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.37 |
| MARY A. BERNARDKing & Spalding | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 14 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 1.97 |
| John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 36 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.27 |