Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. PPIH (last ticker on record)
CIK 914122Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gray Reed & McGraw LLPFirst linked Sep 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 2.73× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked May 2018 · Named in a filing · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- RUDNICK & WOLFEFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gray Reed & McGraw LLP | Sep 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.78 | 2.73 | 1.29 |
| Foley & Lardner | May 2018 | Named in a filing | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| DLA Piper | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Piper Rudnick | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| RUDNICK & WOLFE | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.50 | 1.28 | 0.61 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David R. EarhartGardere Wynne Sewell LLPFirst linked Sep 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Spencer T. MoatsFoley & LardnerFirst linked Apr 2019 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Steven R. BarthFoley & LardnerFirst linked Apr 2019 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Hal M. BrownRUDNICK & WOLFEFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David R. EarhartGardere Wynne Sewell LLP | Sep 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.69 | 0.91 | 1.20 |
| Spencer T. MoatsFoley & Lardner | Apr 2019 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Steven R. BarthFoley & Lardner | Apr 2019 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| Hal M. BrownRUDNICK & WOLFE | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |