AMREIT AMREIT (last ticker on record)
CIK 913957Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Locke LordFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Jul 2008 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locke Lord | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
| Ballard Spahr | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Alston & Bird | Jul 2008 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gina E. BettsLocke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Kenneth L. BettsLocke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Judith D. FryerGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Jason W. GoodeAlston & BirdFirst linked Jul 2008 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gina E. BettsLocke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Kenneth L. BettsLocke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Judith D. FryerGreenberg Traurig | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Jason W. GoodeAlston & Bird | Jul 2008 | Text search only | 21 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |