CAMBRIDGE HEART INC CAMH (last ticker on record)
CIK 913443Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2007 to Nov 2012
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Nutter McClennen & FishFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Grushko & MittmanFirst linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.53× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutter McClennen & Fish | Jan 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 88 | 0.75 | 0.47 | 0.85 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Grushko & Mittman | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 103 | 1.19 | 2.53 | 1.25 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michelle L. BasilNutter McClennen & FishFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.12×
- Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- John A. BurgessHALE AND DORRFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle L. BasilNutter McClennen & Fish | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.12 |
| Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| John A. BurgessHALE AND DORR | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.99 | 0.80 | 0.80 |