Clarus Corp CLAR (last ticker on record)
CIK 913277Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kane Kessler, P.C.First linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kane Kessler, P.C. | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 1.27 | 1.59 | 0.98 |
| Perkins Coie | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 110 | 1.07 | 0.53 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert L. LawrenceKane Kessler, P.C.First linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Elizabeth O. DerrickWomble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 1.52× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- G. DONALD JOHNSONWomble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 4.61× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jeffrey S. TullmanKane Kessler, P.C.First linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert L. LawrenceKane Kessler, P.C. | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.35 | 0.99 | 1.01 |
| Elizabeth O. DerrickWomble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.68 | 1.52 | 0.87 |
| G. DONALD JOHNSONWomble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.73 | 4.61 | 0.00 |
| Jeffrey S. TullmanKane Kessler, P.C. | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 15 | 1.70 | 1.51 | 0.34 |