TOWNSQUARE MEDIA, INC. RGCI (last ticker on record)
CIK 913015Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2000 to Dec 2008
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- GRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEYFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEY | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.65 | 1.38 | 2.34 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard G. SchmalzlGRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEYFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 3.45× · 95% wipeout 2.64×
- Danielle CarboneShearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard G. SchmalzlGRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEY | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.29 | 3.45 | 2.64 |
| Danielle CarboneShearman & Sterling | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 26 | 0.82 | 0.98 | 2.58 |