WEST MARINE INC WMAR (last ticker on record)
CIK 912833Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Oct 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shulman Rogers, P.A.First linked Jun 2017 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.71× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Dow LohnesFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shulman Rogers, P.A. | Jun 2017 | Named in a filing | 25 | 2.71 | 1.26 | 1.16 |
| Dow Lohnes | Aug 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott D. MuselesShulman Rogers, P.A.First linked Jun 2017 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Thomas D. TwedtDow LohnesFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- John F. SeegalOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jan 1999 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 6.02× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Richard V. SmithOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott D. MuselesShulman Rogers, P.A. | Jun 2017 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 1.72 |
| Thomas D. TwedtDow Lohnes | Aug 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| John F. SeegalOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jan 1999 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.69 | 6.02 | 0.96 |
| Richard V. SmithOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |