GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. ROCK (last ticker on record)
CIK 912562Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Named in a filing · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Lippes, Silverstein, Mathias & Wexler LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Phillips LytleFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | May 2022 | Named in a filing | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.88 |
| Lippes, Silverstein, Mathias & Wexler LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Stinson Morrison Hecker | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 93 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Phillips Lytle | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 22 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert J. OlivieriHodgson RussFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Michael E. StorckFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert J. OlivieriHodgson Russ | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Michael E. Storck | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 6 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 |